Skip to content
uswages .org

Substitute Teachers, Short-Term Salary: Oregon vs District of Columbia

Substitute Teachers, Short-Term earn a median of $58,280 in Oregon and $49,790 in District of Columbia. That is a nominal gap of $8,490 (+17.1%), with Oregon paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$58,280
Oregon median
$56,385 after COL
$49,790
District of Columbia median
$45,304 after COL
+17.1%
Nominal gap
Oregon leads
+24.5%
Adjusted gap
Oregon leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Oregon pays $8,490 more per year than District of Columbia for substitute teachers, short-term, a gap of +17.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Oregon still comes out ahead, with roughly $11,080 of extra purchasing power (+24.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for substitute teachers, short-term in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Substitute Teachers, Short-Term

Oregon

Median salary
$58,280
Mean salary
$61,100
Employment
8,090
Location quotient
1.22
Jobs per 1,000
4.1
COL-adjusted median
$56,385
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Substitute Teachers, Short-Term page for Oregon →

Substitute Teachers, Short-Term

District of Columbia

Median salary
$49,790
Mean salary
$49,550
Employment
750
Location quotient
0.31
Jobs per 1,000
1.1
COL-adjusted median
$45,304
Regional Price Parity
109.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Substitute Teachers, Short-Term page for District of Columbia →

Related pages

Keep digging into substitute teachers, short-term from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.