Skip to content
uswages .org

Surgical Technologists Salary: Minnesota vs Oregon

Surgical Technologists earn a median of $80,210 in Minnesota and $81,390 in Oregon. That is a nominal gap of $1,180 (-1.4%), with Oregon paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$80,210
Minnesota median
$81,332 after COL
$81,390
Oregon median
$78,743 after COL
-1.4%
Nominal gap
Oregon leads
+3.3%
Adjusted gap
Minnesota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Oregon pays $1,180 more per year than Minnesota for surgical technologists, a gap of +1.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Minnesota actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $2,588 more in national-price-level terms (a +3.3% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for surgical technologists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Surgical Technologists

Minnesota

Median salary
$80,210
Mean salary
$79,670
Employment
1,770
Location quotient
0.80
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$81,332
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Surgical Technologists page for Minnesota →

Surgical Technologists

Oregon

Median salary
$81,390
Mean salary
$80,990
Employment
1,090
Location quotient
0.74
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$78,743
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Surgical Technologists page for Oregon →

Related pages

Keep digging into surgical technologists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.