Skip to content
uswages .org

Survey Researchers Salary: Albuquerque, NM vs New Haven, CT

Survey Researchers earn a median of $60,820 in Albuquerque, NM and $98,570 in New Haven, CT. That is a nominal gap of $37,750 (-38.3%), with New Haven, CT paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$60,820
Albuquerque, NM median
$63,655 after COL
$98,570
New Haven, CT median
$94,272 after COL
-38.3%
Nominal gap
New Haven, CT leads
-32.5%
Adjusted gap
New Haven, CT leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Haven, CT pays $37,750 more per year than Albuquerque, NM for survey researchers, a gap of +38.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New Haven, CT still comes out ahead, with roughly $30,617 of extra purchasing power (+32.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for survey researchers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Survey Researchers

Albuquerque, NM

Median salary
$60,820
Mean salary
$63,330
Employment
80
Location quotient
3.49
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$63,655
Regional Price Parity
95.5%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Survey Researchers page for Albuquerque, NM →

Survey Researchers

New Haven, CT

Median salary
$98,570
Mean salary
$100,610
Employment
30
Location quotient
2.06
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$94,272
Regional Price Parity
104.6%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Survey Researchers page for New Haven, CT →

Related pages

Keep digging into survey researchers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.