Skip to content
uswages .org

Surveying And Mapping Technicians Salary: Minnesota vs Alaska

Surveying And Mapping Technicians earn a median of $73,190 in Minnesota and $76,970 in Alaska. That is a nominal gap of $3,780 (-4.9%), with Alaska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$73,190
Minnesota median
$74,213 after COL
$76,970
Alaska median
$75,196 after COL
-4.9%
Nominal gap
Alaska leads
-1.3%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alaska pays $3,780 more per year than Minnesota for surveying and mapping technicians, a gap of +4.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alaska still comes out ahead, with roughly $983 of extra purchasing power (+1.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for surveying and mapping technicians in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Surveying And Mapping Technicians

Minnesota

Median salary
$73,190
Mean salary
$72,840
Employment
1,060
Location quotient
0.96
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$74,213
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Surveying And Mapping Technicians page for Minnesota →

Surveying And Mapping Technicians

Alaska

Median salary
$76,970
Mean salary
$78,990
Employment
300
Location quotient
2.49
Jobs per 1,000
0.9
COL-adjusted median
$75,196
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Surveying And Mapping Technicians page for Alaska →

Related pages

Keep digging into surveying and mapping technicians from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.