Skip to content
uswages .org

Tax Preparers Salary: Amarillo, TX vs Jefferson City, MO

Tax Preparers earn a median of $70,980 in Amarillo, TX and $75,990 in Jefferson City, MO. That is a nominal gap of $5,010 (-6.6%), with Jefferson City, MO paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$70,980
Amarillo, TX median
$77,303 after COL
$75,990
Jefferson City, MO median
$86,377 after COL
-6.6%
Nominal gap
Jefferson City, MO leads
-10.5%
Adjusted gap
Jefferson City, MO leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Jefferson City, MO pays $5,010 more per year than Amarillo, TX for tax preparers, a gap of +6.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Jefferson City, MO still comes out ahead, with roughly $9,073 of extra purchasing power (+10.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for tax preparers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Tax Preparers

Amarillo, TX

Median salary
$70,980
Mean salary
$66,640
Employment
60
Location quotient
0.92
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$77,303
Regional Price Parity
91.8%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Tax Preparers page for Amarillo, TX →

Tax Preparers

Jefferson City, MO

Median salary
$75,990
Mean salary
$77,180
Employment
30
Location quotient
0.85
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$86,377
Regional Price Parity
88.0%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Tax Preparers page for Jefferson City, MO →

Related pages

Keep digging into tax preparers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.