Skip to content
uswages .org

Teachers And Instructors, All Other Salary: Maine vs California

Teachers And Instructors, All Other earn a median of $84,330 in Maine and $87,460 in California. That is a nominal gap of $3,130 (-3.6%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$84,330
Maine median
$86,893 after COL
$87,460
California median
$78,992 after COL
-3.6%
Nominal gap
California leads
+10.0%
Adjusted gap
Maine leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $3,130 more per year than Maine for teachers and instructors, all other, a gap of +3.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Maine actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $7,901 more in national-price-level terms (a +10.0% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for teachers and instructors, all other in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Teachers And Instructors, All Other

Maine

Median salary
$84,330
Mean salary
$80,860
Employment
240
Location quotient
0.51
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$86,893
Regional Price Parity
97.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Teachers And Instructors, All Other page for Maine →

Teachers And Instructors, All Other

California

Median salary
$87,460
Mean salary
$90,580
Employment
31,010
Location quotient
2.33
Jobs per 1,000
1.7
COL-adjusted median
$78,992
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Teachers And Instructors, All Other page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into teachers and instructors, all other from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.