Skip to content
uswages .org

Teachers And Instructors, All Other Salary: Virginia vs Kansas

Teachers And Instructors, All Other earn a median of $85,280 in Virginia and $94,520 in Kansas. That is a nominal gap of $9,240 (-9.8%), with Kansas paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$85,280
Virginia median
$84,349 after COL
$94,520
Kansas median
$104,943 after COL
-9.8%
Nominal gap
Kansas leads
-19.6%
Adjusted gap
Kansas leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Kansas pays $9,240 more per year than Virginia for teachers and instructors, all other, a gap of +9.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Kansas still comes out ahead, with roughly $20,594 of extra purchasing power (+19.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for teachers and instructors, all other in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Teachers And Instructors, All Other

Virginia

Median salary
$85,280
Mean salary
$89,460
Employment
3,020
Location quotient
1.00
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$84,349
Regional Price Parity
101.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Teachers And Instructors, All Other page for Virginia →

Teachers And Instructors, All Other

Kansas

Median salary
$94,520
Mean salary
$88,690
Employment
720
Location quotient
0.68
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$104,943
Regional Price Parity
90.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Teachers And Instructors, All Other page for Kansas →

Related pages

Keep digging into teachers and instructors, all other from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.