Skip to content
uswages .org

Technical Writers Salary: District of Columbia vs Washington

Technical Writers earn a median of $117,810 in District of Columbia and $104,070 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $13,740 (+13.2%), with District of Columbia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$117,810
District of Columbia median
$107,196 after COL
$104,070
Washington median
$97,250 after COL
+13.2%
Nominal gap
District of Columbia leads
+10.2%
Adjusted gap
District of Columbia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, District of Columbia pays $13,740 more per year than Washington for technical writers, a gap of +13.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, District of Columbia still comes out ahead, with roughly $9,947 of extra purchasing power (+10.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for technical writers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Technical Writers

District of Columbia

Median salary
$117,810
Mean salary
$112,210
Employment
440
Location quotient
2.15
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$107,196
Regional Price Parity
109.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Technical Writers page for District of Columbia →

Technical Writers

Washington

Median salary
$104,070
Mean salary
$109,840
Employment
1,620
Location quotient
1.56
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$97,250
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Technical Writers page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into technical writers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.