Skip to content
uswages .org

Telemarketers Salary: Connecticut vs California

Telemarketers earn a median of $45,200 in Connecticut and $46,000 in California. That is a nominal gap of $800 (-1.7%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$45,200
Connecticut median
$43,625 after COL
$46,000
California median
$41,546 after COL
-1.7%
Nominal gap
California leads
+5.0%
Adjusted gap
Connecticut leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $800 more per year than Connecticut for telemarketers, a gap of +1.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Connecticut actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $2,079 more in national-price-level terms (a +5.0% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for telemarketers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Telemarketers

Connecticut

Median salary
$45,200
Mean salary
$48,240
Employment
110
Location quotient
0.18
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$43,625
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Telemarketers page for Connecticut →

Telemarketers

California

Median salary
$46,000
Mean salary
$47,160
Employment
3,880
Location quotient
0.57
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$41,546
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Telemarketers page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into telemarketers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.