Skip to content
uswages .org

Tellers Salary: California vs Alaska

Tellers earn a median of $46,900 in California and $46,770 in Alaska. That is a nominal gap of $130 (+0.3%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$46,900
California median
$42,359 after COL
$46,770
Alaska median
$45,692 after COL
+0.3%
Nominal gap
California leads
-7.3%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $130 more per year than Alaska for tellers, a gap of +0.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Alaska actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $3,333 more in national-price-level terms (a +7.3% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for tellers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Tellers

California

Median salary
$46,900
Mean salary
$47,790
Employment
25,230
Location quotient
0.65
Jobs per 1,000
1.4
COL-adjusted median
$42,359
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tellers page for California →

Tellers

Alaska

Median salary
$46,770
Mean salary
$46,970
Employment
1,020
Location quotient
1.48
Jobs per 1,000
3.1
COL-adjusted median
$45,692
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tellers page for Alaska →

Related pages

Keep digging into tellers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.