Skip to content
uswages .org

Tellers Salary: Connecticut vs Massachusetts

Tellers earn a median of $46,320 in Connecticut and $46,900 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $580 (-1.2%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$46,320
Connecticut median
$44,706 after COL
$46,900
Massachusetts median
$44,347 after COL
-1.2%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
+0.8%
Adjusted gap
Connecticut leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $580 more per year than Connecticut for tellers, a gap of +1.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Connecticut actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $359 more in national-price-level terms (a +0.8% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for tellers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Tellers

Connecticut

Median salary
$46,320
Mean salary
$46,640
Employment
3,220
Location quotient
0.90
Jobs per 1,000
1.9
COL-adjusted median
$44,706
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tellers page for Connecticut →

Tellers

Massachusetts

Median salary
$46,900
Mean salary
$46,850
Employment
7,190
Location quotient
0.93
Jobs per 1,000
2.0
COL-adjusted median
$44,347
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tellers page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into tellers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.