Skip to content
uswages .org

Tile And Stone Setters Salary: Maine vs Washington

Tile And Stone Setters earn a median of $70,720 in Maine and $77,920 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $7,200 (-9.2%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$70,720
Maine median
$72,870 after COL
$77,920
Washington median
$72,814 after COL
-9.2%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
+0.1%
Adjusted gap
Maine leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $7,200 more per year than Maine for tile and stone setters, a gap of +9.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Maine actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $56 more in national-price-level terms (a +0.1% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for tile and stone setters in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Tile And Stone Setters

Maine

Median salary
$70,720
Mean salary
$83,810
Employment
60
Location quotient
0.41
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$72,870
Regional Price Parity
97.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tile And Stone Setters page for Maine →

Tile And Stone Setters

Washington

Median salary
$77,920
Mean salary
$79,060
Employment
660
Location quotient
0.81
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$72,814
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tile And Stone Setters page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into tile and stone setters from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.