Skip to content
uswages .org

Tile And Stone Setters Salary: Utah vs Pennsylvania

Tile And Stone Setters earn a median of $49,340 in Utah and $70,230 in Pennsylvania. That is a nominal gap of $20,890 (-29.7%), with Pennsylvania paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$49,340
Utah median
$49,907 after COL
$70,230
Pennsylvania median
$71,978 after COL
-29.7%
Nominal gap
Pennsylvania leads
-30.7%
Adjusted gap
Pennsylvania leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Pennsylvania pays $20,890 more per year than Utah for tile and stone setters, a gap of +29.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Pennsylvania still comes out ahead, with roughly $22,071 of extra purchasing power (+30.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for tile and stone setters in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Tile And Stone Setters

Utah

Median salary
$49,340
Mean salary
$51,800
Employment
1,590
Location quotient
3.96
Jobs per 1,000
0.9
COL-adjusted median
$49,907
Regional Price Parity
98.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tile And Stone Setters page for Utah →

Tile And Stone Setters

Pennsylvania

Median salary
$70,230
Mean salary
$67,560
Employment
880
Location quotient
0.63
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$71,978
Regional Price Parity
97.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tile And Stone Setters page for Pennsylvania →

Related pages

Keep digging into tile and stone setters from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.