Skip to content
uswages .org

Tire Repairers And Changers Salary: Vermont vs Oregon

Tire Repairers And Changers earn a median of $44,480 in Vermont and $47,650 in Oregon. That is a nominal gap of $3,170 (-6.7%), with Oregon paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$44,480
Vermont median
$45,407 after COL
$47,650
Oregon median
$46,101 after COL
-6.7%
Nominal gap
Oregon leads
-1.5%
Adjusted gap
Oregon leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Oregon pays $3,170 more per year than Vermont for tire repairers and changers, a gap of +6.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Oregon still comes out ahead, with roughly $693 of extra purchasing power (+1.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for tire repairers and changers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Tire Repairers And Changers

Vermont

Median salary
$44,480
Mean salary
$43,900
Employment
120
Location quotient
0.57
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$45,407
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tire Repairers And Changers page for Vermont →

Tire Repairers And Changers

Oregon

Median salary
$47,650
Mean salary
$46,690
Employment
2,260
Location quotient
1.65
Jobs per 1,000
1.1
COL-adjusted median
$46,101
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tire Repairers And Changers page for Oregon →

Related pages

Keep digging into tire repairers and changers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.