Skip to content
uswages .org

Tool And Die Makers Salary: Washington vs Maine

Tool And Die Makers earn a median of $109,390 in Washington and $79,910 in Maine. That is a nominal gap of $29,480 (+36.9%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$109,390
Washington median
$102,221 after COL
$79,910
Maine median
$82,339 after COL
+36.9%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
+24.1%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $29,480 more per year than Maine for tool and die makers, a gap of +36.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $19,882 of extra purchasing power (+24.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for tool and die makers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Tool And Die Makers

Washington

Median salary
$109,390
Mean salary
$97,090
Employment
1,510
Location quotient
1.16
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$102,221
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tool And Die Makers page for Washington →

Tool And Die Makers

Maine

Median salary
$79,910
Mean salary
$73,240
Employment
80
Location quotient
0.33
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$82,339
Regional Price Parity
97.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tool And Die Makers page for Maine →

Related pages

Keep digging into tool and die makers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.