Skip to content
uswages .org

Tool Grinders, Filers, And Sharpeners Salary: Kansas vs Ohio

Tool Grinders, Filers, And Sharpeners earn a median of $54,100 in Kansas and $56,690 in Ohio. That is a nominal gap of $2,590 (-4.6%), with Ohio paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$54,100
Kansas median
$60,066 after COL
$56,690
Ohio median
$61,105 after COL
-4.6%
Nominal gap
Ohio leads
-1.7%
Adjusted gap
Ohio leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Ohio pays $2,590 more per year than Kansas for tool grinders, filers, and sharpeners, a gap of +4.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Ohio still comes out ahead, with roughly $1,040 of extra purchasing power (+1.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for tool grinders, filers, and sharpeners in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Tool Grinders, Filers, And Sharpeners

Kansas

Median salary
$54,100
Mean salary
$53,620
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$60,066
Regional Price Parity
90.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tool Grinders, Filers, And Sharpeners page for Kansas →

Tool Grinders, Filers, And Sharpeners

Ohio

Median salary
$56,690
Mean salary
$60,000
Employment
190
Location quotient
0.93
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$61,105
Regional Price Parity
92.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tool Grinders, Filers, And Sharpeners page for Ohio →

Related pages

Keep digging into tool grinders, filers, and sharpeners from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.