Tool Grinders, Filers, And Sharpeners Salary: Ohio vs Oregon
Tool Grinders, Filers, And Sharpeners earn a median of $56,690 in Ohio and $60,760 in Oregon. That is a nominal gap of $4,070 (-6.7%), with Oregon paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.
The story behind the numbers
On raw wages, Oregon pays $4,070 more per year than Ohio for tool grinders, filers, and sharpeners, a gap of +6.7%.
After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Ohio actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $2,321 more in national-price-level terms (a +3.9% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.
Full breakdown by location
Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for tool grinders, filers, and sharpeners in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.
Ohio
- Median salary
- $56,690
- Mean salary
- $60,000
- Employment
- 190
- Location quotient
- 0.93
- Jobs per 1,000
- 0.0
- COL-adjusted median
- $61,105
- Regional Price Parity
- 92.8%
Exact state RPP match.
Oregon
- Median salary
- $60,760
- Mean salary
- $62,730
- Employment
- 430
- Location quotient
- 6.13
- Jobs per 1,000
- 0.2
- COL-adjusted median
- $58,784
- Regional Price Parity
- 103.4%
Exact state RPP match.
Full Tool Grinders, Filers, And Sharpeners page for Oregon →
Related pages
Keep digging into tool grinders, filers, and sharpeners from a different angle.
- National Tool Grinders, Filers, And Sharpeners salary page
- Compare a different occupation or location
Common questions about this comparison
What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +
It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.
Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +
High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.
What is a location quotient? +
The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.