Skip to content
uswages .org

Tour And Travel Guides Salary: Washington vs Wyoming

Tour And Travel Guides earn a median of $54,160 in Washington and $47,020 in Wyoming. That is a nominal gap of $7,140 (+15.2%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$54,160
Washington median
$50,611 after COL
$47,020
Wyoming median
$50,728 after COL
+15.2%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-0.2%
Adjusted gap
Wyoming leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $7,140 more per year than Wyoming for tour and travel guides, a gap of +15.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Wyoming actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $117 more in national-price-level terms (a +0.2% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for tour and travel guides in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Tour And Travel Guides

Washington

Median salary
$54,160
Mean salary
$56,820
Employment
1,420
Location quotient
1.16
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$50,611
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tour And Travel Guides page for Washington →

Tour And Travel Guides

Wyoming

Median salary
$47,020
Mean salary
$46,880
Employment
560
Location quotient
5.80
Jobs per 1,000
2.0
COL-adjusted median
$50,728
Regional Price Parity
92.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tour And Travel Guides page for Wyoming →

Related pages

Keep digging into tour and travel guides from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.