Skip to content
uswages .org

Transit And Railroad Police Salary: Florida vs Texas

Transit And Railroad Police earn a median of $69,810 in Florida and $78,480 in Texas. That is a nominal gap of $8,670 (-11.0%), with Texas paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$69,810
Florida median
$67,505 after COL
$78,480
Texas median
$80,860 after COL
-11.0%
Nominal gap
Texas leads
-16.5%
Adjusted gap
Texas leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Texas pays $8,670 more per year than Florida for transit and railroad police, a gap of +11.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Texas still comes out ahead, with roughly $13,354 of extra purchasing power (+16.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for transit and railroad police in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Transit And Railroad Police

Florida

Median salary
$69,810
Mean salary
$69,890
Employment
40
Location quotient
0.16
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$67,505
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Transit And Railroad Police page for Florida →

Transit And Railroad Police

Texas

Median salary
$78,480
Mean salary
$85,310
Employment
80
Location quotient
0.19
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$80,860
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Transit And Railroad Police page for Texas →

Related pages

Keep digging into transit and railroad police from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.