Skip to content
uswages .org

Transit And Railroad Police Salary: Missouri vs Utah

Transit And Railroad Police earn a median of $67,840 in Missouri and $87,770 in Utah. That is a nominal gap of $19,930 (-22.7%), with Utah paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$67,840
Missouri median
$74,700 after COL
$87,770
Utah median
$88,779 after COL
-22.7%
Nominal gap
Utah leads
-15.9%
Adjusted gap
Utah leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Utah pays $19,930 more per year than Missouri for transit and railroad police, a gap of +22.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Utah still comes out ahead, with roughly $14,079 of extra purchasing power (+15.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for transit and railroad police in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Transit And Railroad Police

Missouri

Median salary
$67,840
Mean salary
$73,560
Employment
90
Location quotient
1.09
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$74,700
Regional Price Parity
90.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Transit And Railroad Police page for Missouri →

Transit And Railroad Police

Utah

Median salary
$87,770
Mean salary
$85,840
Employment
80
Location quotient
1.54
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$88,779
Regional Price Parity
98.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Transit And Railroad Police page for Utah →

Related pages

Keep digging into transit and railroad police from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.