Skip to content
uswages .org

Transportation Inspectors Salary: Alabama vs North Dakota

Transportation Inspectors earn a median of $108,140 in Alabama and $106,330 in North Dakota. That is a nominal gap of $1,810 (+1.7%), with Alabama paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$108,140
Alabama median
$121,748 after COL
$106,330
North Dakota median
$119,527 after COL
+1.7%
Nominal gap
Alabama leads
+1.9%
Adjusted gap
Alabama leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alabama pays $1,810 more per year than North Dakota for transportation inspectors, a gap of +1.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alabama still comes out ahead, with roughly $2,221 of extra purchasing power (+1.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for transportation inspectors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Transportation Inspectors

Alabama

Median salary
$108,140
Mean salary
$100,700
Employment
670
Location quotient
2.01
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$121,748
Regional Price Parity
88.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Transportation Inspectors page for Alabama →

Transportation Inspectors

North Dakota

Median salary
$106,330
Mean salary
$104,020
Employment
60
Location quotient
0.90
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$119,527
Regional Price Parity
89.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Transportation Inspectors page for North Dakota →

Related pages

Keep digging into transportation inspectors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.