Skip to content
uswages .org

Tree Trimmers And Pruners Salary: New Haven, CT vs Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA

Tree Trimmers And Pruners earn a median of $76,450 in New Haven, CT and $73,570 in Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA. That is a nominal gap of $2,880 (+3.9%), with New Haven, CT paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$76,450
New Haven, CT median
$73,117 after COL
$73,570
Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA median
$68,257 after COL
+3.9%
Nominal gap
New Haven, CT leads
+7.1%
Adjusted gap
New Haven, CT leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Haven, CT pays $2,880 more per year than Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA for tree trimmers and pruners, a gap of +3.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New Haven, CT still comes out ahead, with roughly $4,860 of extra purchasing power (+7.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for tree trimmers and pruners in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Tree Trimmers And Pruners

New Haven, CT

Median salary
$76,450
Mean salary
$69,100
Employment
40
Location quotient
0.43
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$73,117
Regional Price Parity
104.6%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Tree Trimmers And Pruners page for New Haven, CT →

Tree Trimmers And Pruners

Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA

Median salary
$73,570
Mean salary
$76,580
Employment
190
Location quotient
2.57
Jobs per 1,000
0.9
COL-adjusted median
$68,257
Regional Price Parity
107.8%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Tree Trimmers And Pruners page for Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA →

Related pages

Keep digging into tree trimmers and pruners from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.