Skip to content
uswages .org

Tree Trimmers And Pruners Salary: Oregon vs New Jersey

Tree Trimmers And Pruners earn a median of $75,440 in Oregon and $71,940 in New Jersey. That is a nominal gap of $3,500 (+4.9%), with Oregon paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$75,440
Oregon median
$72,987 after COL
$71,940
New Jersey median
$66,118 after COL
+4.9%
Nominal gap
Oregon leads
+10.4%
Adjusted gap
Oregon leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Oregon pays $3,500 more per year than New Jersey for tree trimmers and pruners, a gap of +4.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Oregon still comes out ahead, with roughly $6,869 of extra purchasing power (+10.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for tree trimmers and pruners in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Tree Trimmers And Pruners

Oregon

Median salary
$75,440
Mean salary
$73,630
Employment
1,610
Location quotient
2.30
Jobs per 1,000
0.8
COL-adjusted median
$72,987
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tree Trimmers And Pruners page for Oregon →

Tree Trimmers And Pruners

New Jersey

Median salary
$71,940
Mean salary
$69,760
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$66,118
Regional Price Parity
108.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tree Trimmers And Pruners page for New Jersey →

Related pages

Keep digging into tree trimmers and pruners from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.