Skip to content
uswages .org

Tutors Salary: Ann Arbor, MI vs Midland, MI

Tutors earn a median of $37,380 in Ann Arbor, MI and $76,680 in Midland, MI. That is a nominal gap of $39,300 (-51.3%), with Midland, MI paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$37,380
Ann Arbor, MI median
$37,054 after COL
$76,680
Midland, MI median
$83,419 after COL
-51.3%
Nominal gap
Midland, MI leads
-55.6%
Adjusted gap
Midland, MI leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Midland, MI pays $39,300 more per year than Ann Arbor, MI for tutors, a gap of +51.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Midland, MI still comes out ahead, with roughly $46,366 of extra purchasing power (+55.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for tutors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Tutors

Ann Arbor, MI

Median salary
$37,380
Mean salary
$39,010
Employment
1,820
Location quotient
7.38
Jobs per 1,000
8.3
COL-adjusted median
$37,054
Regional Price Parity
100.9%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Tutors page for Ann Arbor, MI →

Tutors

Midland, MI

Median salary
$76,680
Mean salary
$61,930
Employment
40
Location quotient
0.93
Jobs per 1,000
1.0
COL-adjusted median
$83,419
Regional Price Parity
91.9%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Tutors page for Midland, MI →

Related pages

Keep digging into tutors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.