Skip to content
uswages .org

Urban And Regional Planners Salary: Colorado vs Oregon

Urban And Regional Planners earn a median of $101,340 in Colorado and $103,070 in Oregon. That is a nominal gap of $1,730 (-1.7%), with Oregon paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$101,340
Colorado median
$98,339 after COL
$103,070
Oregon median
$99,718 after COL
-1.7%
Nominal gap
Oregon leads
-1.4%
Adjusted gap
Oregon leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Oregon pays $1,730 more per year than Colorado for urban and regional planners, a gap of +1.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Oregon still comes out ahead, with roughly $1,380 of extra purchasing power (+1.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for urban and regional planners in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Urban And Regional Planners

Colorado

Median salary
$101,340
Mean salary
$103,950
Employment
1,300
Location quotient
1.59
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$98,339
Regional Price Parity
103.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Urban And Regional Planners page for Colorado →

Urban And Regional Planners

Oregon

Median salary
$103,070
Mean salary
$100,620
Employment
1,010
Location quotient
1.80
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$99,718
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Urban And Regional Planners page for Oregon →

Related pages

Keep digging into urban and regional planners from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.