Skip to content
uswages .org

Urban And Regional Planners Salary: Nevada vs Oregon

Urban And Regional Planners earn a median of $100,040 in Nevada and $103,070 in Oregon. That is a nominal gap of $3,030 (-2.9%), with Oregon paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$100,040
Nevada median
$100,061 after COL
$103,070
Oregon median
$99,718 after COL
-2.9%
Nominal gap
Oregon leads
+0.3%
Adjusted gap
Nevada leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Oregon pays $3,030 more per year than Nevada for urban and regional planners, a gap of +2.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Nevada actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $343 more in national-price-level terms (a +0.3% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for urban and regional planners in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Urban And Regional Planners

Nevada

Median salary
$100,040
Mean salary
$103,380
Employment
270
Location quotient
0.60
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$100,061
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Urban And Regional Planners page for Nevada →

Urban And Regional Planners

Oregon

Median salary
$103,070
Mean salary
$100,620
Employment
1,010
Location quotient
1.80
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$99,718
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Urban And Regional Planners page for Oregon →

Related pages

Keep digging into urban and regional planners from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.