Waiters And Waitresses Salary: Colorado Springs, CO vs Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA
Waiters And Waitresses earn a median of $36,760 in Colorado Springs, CO and $48,760 in Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA. That is a nominal gap of $12,000 (-24.6%), with Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.
The story behind the numbers
On raw wages, Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA pays $12,000 more per year than Colorado Springs, CO for waiters and waitresses, a gap of +24.6%.
After adjusting for cost of living, Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA still comes out ahead, with roughly $7,373 of extra purchasing power (+16.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.
Full breakdown by location
Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for waiters and waitresses in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.
Waiters And Waitresses
Colorado Springs, CO
- Median salary
- $36,760
- Mean salary
- $49,380
- Employment
- 4,710
- Location quotient
- 0.99
- Jobs per 1,000
- 14.8
- COL-adjusted median
- $36,502
- Regional Price Parity
- 100.7%
Exact metro RPP match.
Waiters And Waitresses
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA
- Median salary
- $48,760
- Mean salary
- $58,180
- Employment
- 25,860
- Location quotient
- 0.83
- Jobs per 1,000
- 12.4
- COL-adjusted median
- $43,875
- Regional Price Parity
- 111.1%
Exact metro RPP match.
Full Waiters And Waitresses page for Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA →
Related pages
Keep digging into waiters and waitresses from a different angle.
Common questions about this comparison
What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +
It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.
Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +
High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.
What is a location quotient? +
The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.