Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Waiters And Waitresses Salary: Utah vs Maine

Waiters And Waitresses earn a median of $29,860 in Utah and $44,550 in Maine. That is a nominal gap of $14,690 (-33.0%), with Maine paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$29,860
Utah median
$30,203 after COL
$44,550
Maine median
$45,904 after COL
-33.0%
Nominal gap
Maine leads
-34.2%
Adjusted gap
Maine leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Maine pays $14,690 more per year than Utah for waiters and waitresses, a gap of +33.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Maine still comes out ahead, with roughly $15,701 of extra purchasing power (+34.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for waiters and waitresses in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Waiters And Waitresses

Utah

Median salary
$29,860
Mean salary
$34,030
Employment
18,030
Location quotient
0.71
Jobs per 1,000
10.5
COL-adjusted median
$30,203
Regional Price Parity
98.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Waiters And Waitresses page for Utah →

Waiters And Waitresses

Maine

Median salary
$44,550
Mean salary
$52,390
Employment
8,540
Location quotient
0.90
Jobs per 1,000
13.4
COL-adjusted median
$45,904
Regional Price Parity
97.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Waiters And Waitresses page for Maine →

Related pages

Keep digging into waiters and waitresses from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.