Skip to content
uswages .org

Web And Digital Interface Designers Salary: Rhode Island vs New Hampshire

Web And Digital Interface Designers earn a median of $105,990 in Rhode Island and $111,150 in New Hampshire. That is a nominal gap of $5,160 (-4.6%), with New Hampshire paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$105,990
Rhode Island median
$103,627 after COL
$111,150
New Hampshire median
$106,706 after COL
-4.6%
Nominal gap
New Hampshire leads
-2.9%
Adjusted gap
New Hampshire leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Hampshire pays $5,160 more per year than Rhode Island for web and digital interface designers, a gap of +4.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New Hampshire still comes out ahead, with roughly $3,078 of extra purchasing power (+2.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for web and digital interface designers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Web And Digital Interface Designers

Rhode Island

Median salary
$105,990
Mean salary
$109,360
Employment
240
Location quotient
0.66
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$103,627
Regional Price Parity
102.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Web And Digital Interface Designers page for Rhode Island →

Web And Digital Interface Designers

New Hampshire

Median salary
$111,150
Mean salary
$106,270
Employment
430
Location quotient
0.86
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$106,706
Regional Price Parity
104.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Web And Digital Interface Designers page for New Hampshire →

Related pages

Keep digging into web and digital interface designers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.