Skip to content
uswages .org

Word Processors And Typists Salary: Idaho vs Massachusetts

Word Processors And Typists earn a median of $49,930 in Idaho and $53,740 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $3,810 (-7.1%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$49,930
Idaho median
$52,286 after COL
$53,740
Massachusetts median
$50,815 after COL
-7.1%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
+2.9%
Adjusted gap
Idaho leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $3,810 more per year than Idaho for word processors and typists, a gap of +7.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Idaho actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $1,471 more in national-price-level terms (a +2.9% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for word processors and typists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Word Processors And Typists

Idaho

Median salary
$49,930
Mean salary
$48,470
Employment
60
Location quotient
0.31
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$52,286
Regional Price Parity
95.5%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Word Processors And Typists page for Idaho →

Word Processors And Typists

Massachusetts

Median salary
$53,740
Mean salary
$54,540
Employment
350
Location quotient
0.42
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$50,815
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Word Processors And Typists page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into word processors and typists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.