Skip to content
uswages .org

Writers And Authors Salary: Massachusetts vs Vermont

Writers And Authors earn a median of $85,260 in Massachusetts and $94,430 in Vermont. That is a nominal gap of $9,170 (-9.7%), with Vermont paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$85,260
Massachusetts median
$80,619 after COL
$94,430
Vermont median
$96,398 after COL
-9.7%
Nominal gap
Vermont leads
-16.4%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Vermont pays $9,170 more per year than Massachusetts for writers and authors, a gap of +9.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Vermont still comes out ahead, with roughly $15,780 of extra purchasing power (+16.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for writers and authors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Writers And Authors

Massachusetts

Median salary
$85,260
Mean salary
$94,580
Employment
1,350
Location quotient
1.20
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$80,619
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Writers And Authors page for Massachusetts →

Writers And Authors

Vermont

Median salary
$94,430
Mean salary
$96,260
Employment
110
Location quotient
1.23
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$96,398
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Writers And Authors page for Vermont →

Related pages

Keep digging into writers and authors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.