Skip to content
uswages .org

Writers And Authors Salary: Washington vs California

Writers And Authors earn a median of $85,700 in Washington and $86,480 in California. That is a nominal gap of $780 (-0.9%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$85,700
Washington median
$80,084 after COL
$86,480
California median
$78,107 after COL
-0.9%
Nominal gap
California leads
+2.5%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $780 more per year than Washington for writers and authors, a gap of +0.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Washington actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $1,977 more in national-price-level terms (a +2.5% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for writers and authors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Writers And Authors

Washington

Median salary
$85,700
Mean salary
$90,740
Employment
770
Location quotient
0.71
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$80,084
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Writers And Authors page for Washington →

Writers And Authors

California

Median salary
$86,480
Mean salary
$106,560
Employment
8,390
Location quotient
1.49
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$78,107
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Writers And Authors page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into writers and authors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.