Skip to content
uswages .org

Arbitrators, Mediators, And Conciliators Salary: New Mexico vs Colorado

Arbitrators, Mediators, And Conciliators earn a median of $110,180 in New Mexico and $82,590 in Colorado. That is a nominal gap of $27,590 (+33.4%), with New Mexico paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$110,180
New Mexico median
$119,486 after COL
$82,590
Colorado median
$80,144 after COL
+33.4%
Nominal gap
New Mexico leads
+49.1%
Adjusted gap
New Mexico leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Mexico pays $27,590 more per year than Colorado for arbitrators, mediators, and conciliators, a gap of +33.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New Mexico still comes out ahead, with roughly $39,342 of extra purchasing power (+49.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for arbitrators, mediators, and conciliators in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Arbitrators, Mediators, And Conciliators

New Mexico

Median salary
$110,180
Mean salary
$115,810
Employment
40
Location quotient
0.80
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$119,486
Regional Price Parity
92.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Arbitrators, Mediators, And Conciliators page for New Mexico →

Arbitrators, Mediators, And Conciliators

Colorado

Median salary
$82,590
Mean salary
$83,500
Employment
30
Location quotient
0.18
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$80,144
Regional Price Parity
103.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Arbitrators, Mediators, And Conciliators page for Colorado →

Related pages

Keep digging into arbitrators, mediators, and conciliators from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.