Skip to content
uswages .org

Cost Estimators Salary: Wyoming vs Alaska

Cost Estimators earn a median of $90,790 in Wyoming and $97,020 in Alaska. That is a nominal gap of $6,230 (-6.4%), with Alaska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$90,790
Wyoming median
$97,949 after COL
$97,020
Alaska median
$94,784 after COL
-6.4%
Nominal gap
Alaska leads
+3.3%
Adjusted gap
Wyoming leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alaska pays $6,230 more per year than Wyoming for cost estimators, a gap of +6.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Wyoming actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $3,165 more in national-price-level terms (a +3.3% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for cost estimators in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Cost Estimators

Wyoming

Median salary
$90,790
Mean salary
$88,240
Employment
440
Location quotient
1.09
Jobs per 1,000
1.6
COL-adjusted median
$97,949
Regional Price Parity
92.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cost Estimators page for Wyoming →

Cost Estimators

Alaska

Median salary
$97,020
Mean salary
$101,890
Employment
220
Location quotient
0.46
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$94,784
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cost Estimators page for Alaska →

Related pages

Keep digging into cost estimators from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.