Skip to content
uswages .org

Driver/Sales Workers Salary: Alaska vs Iowa

Driver/Sales Workers earn a median of $48,420 in Alaska and $47,120 in Iowa. That is a nominal gap of $1,300 (+2.8%), with Alaska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$48,420
Alaska median
$47,304 after COL
$47,120
Iowa median
$53,691 after COL
+2.8%
Nominal gap
Alaska leads
-11.9%
Adjusted gap
Iowa leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alaska pays $1,300 more per year than Iowa for driver/sales workers, a gap of +2.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Iowa actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $6,387 more in national-price-level terms (a +11.9% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for driver/sales workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Driver/Sales Workers

Alaska

Median salary
$48,420
Mean salary
$48,120
Employment
1,270
Location quotient
1.48
Jobs per 1,000
3.9
COL-adjusted median
$47,304
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Driver/Sales Workers page for Alaska →

Driver/Sales Workers

Iowa

Median salary
$47,120
Mean salary
$45,260
Employment
4,400
Location quotient
1.07
Jobs per 1,000
2.8
COL-adjusted median
$53,691
Regional Price Parity
87.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Driver/Sales Workers page for Iowa →

Related pages

Keep digging into driver/sales workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.