Skip to content
uswages .org

Driver/Sales Workers Salary: California vs Alaska

Driver/Sales Workers earn a median of $45,600 in California and $48,420 in Alaska. That is a nominal gap of $2,820 (-5.8%), with Alaska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$45,600
California median
$41,185 after COL
$48,420
Alaska median
$47,304 after COL
-5.8%
Nominal gap
Alaska leads
-12.9%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alaska pays $2,820 more per year than California for driver/sales workers, a gap of +5.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alaska still comes out ahead, with roughly $6,119 of extra purchasing power (+12.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for driver/sales workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Driver/Sales Workers

California

Median salary
$45,600
Mean salary
$48,220
Employment
34,480
Location quotient
0.72
Jobs per 1,000
1.9
COL-adjusted median
$41,185
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Driver/Sales Workers page for California →

Driver/Sales Workers

Alaska

Median salary
$48,420
Mean salary
$48,120
Employment
1,270
Location quotient
1.48
Jobs per 1,000
3.9
COL-adjusted median
$47,304
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Driver/Sales Workers page for Alaska →

Related pages

Keep digging into driver/sales workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.