Skip to content
uswages .org

Fundraising Managers Salary: Washington vs New Hampshire

Fundraising Managers earn a median of $137,010 in Washington and $157,080 in New Hampshire. That is a nominal gap of $20,070 (-12.8%), with New Hampshire paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$137,010
Washington median
$128,031 after COL
$157,080
New Hampshire median
$150,799 after COL
-12.8%
Nominal gap
New Hampshire leads
-15.1%
Adjusted gap
New Hampshire leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Hampshire pays $20,070 more per year than Washington for fundraising managers, a gap of +12.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New Hampshire still comes out ahead, with roughly $22,768 of extra purchasing power (+15.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for fundraising managers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Fundraising Managers

Washington

Median salary
$137,010
Mean salary
$156,340
Employment
1,050
Location quotient
1.19
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$128,031
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fundraising Managers page for Washington →

Fundraising Managers

New Hampshire

Median salary
$157,080
Mean salary
$161,200
Employment
270
Location quotient
1.56
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$150,799
Regional Price Parity
104.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fundraising Managers page for New Hampshire →

Related pages

Keep digging into fundraising managers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.