Skip to content
uswages .org

Human Resources Specialists Salary: Washington vs New York

Human Resources Specialists earn a median of $84,550 in Washington and $84,380 in New York. That is a nominal gap of $170 (+0.2%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$84,550
Washington median
$79,009 after COL
$84,380
New York median
$78,187 after COL
+0.2%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
+1.1%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $170 more per year than New York for human resources specialists, a gap of +0.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $822 of extra purchasing power (+1.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for human resources specialists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Human Resources Specialists

Washington

Median salary
$84,550
Mean salary
$94,000
Employment
22,770
Location quotient
1.09
Jobs per 1,000
6.4
COL-adjusted median
$79,009
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Human Resources Specialists page for Washington →

Human Resources Specialists

New York

Median salary
$84,380
Mean salary
$95,040
Employment
54,610
Location quotient
0.96
Jobs per 1,000
5.6
COL-adjusted median
$78,187
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Human Resources Specialists page for New York →

Related pages

Keep digging into human resources specialists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.