Skip to content
uswages .org

Marketing Managers Salary: Cleveland, TN vs Billings, MT

Marketing Managers earn a median of $114,570 in Cleveland, TN and $212,760 in Billings, MT. That is a nominal gap of $98,190 (-46.2%), with Billings, MT paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$114,570
Cleveland, TN median
$130,075 after COL
$212,760
Billings, MT median
$227,488 after COL
-46.2%
Nominal gap
Billings, MT leads
-42.8%
Adjusted gap
Billings, MT leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Billings, MT pays $98,190 more per year than Cleveland, TN for marketing managers, a gap of +46.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Billings, MT still comes out ahead, with roughly $97,413 of extra purchasing power (+42.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for marketing managers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Marketing Managers

Cleveland, TN

Median salary
$114,570
Mean salary
$132,580
Employment
60
Location quotient
0.56
Jobs per 1,000
1.4
COL-adjusted median
$130,075
Regional Price Parity
88.1%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Marketing Managers page for Cleveland, TN →

Marketing Managers

Billings, MT

Median salary
$212,760
Mean salary
$176,460
Employment
160
Location quotient
0.68
Jobs per 1,000
1.7
COL-adjusted median
$227,488
Regional Price Parity
93.5%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Marketing Managers page for Billings, MT →

Related pages

Keep digging into marketing managers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.