Skip to content
uswages .org

Marketing Managers Salary: New York vs California

Marketing Managers earn a median of $181,200 in New York and $193,620 in California. That is a nominal gap of $12,420 (-6.4%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$181,200
New York median
$167,901 after COL
$193,620
California median
$174,874 after COL
-6.4%
Nominal gap
California leads
-4.0%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $12,420 more per year than New York for marketing managers, a gap of +6.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $6,973 of extra purchasing power (+4.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for marketing managers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Marketing Managers

New York

Median salary
$181,200
Mean salary
$202,480
Employment
54,000
Location quotient
2.19
Jobs per 1,000
5.6
COL-adjusted median
$167,901
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Marketing Managers page for New York →

Marketing Managers

California

Median salary
$193,620
Mean salary
$207,860
Employment
54,660
Location quotient
1.18
Jobs per 1,000
3.0
COL-adjusted median
$174,874
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Marketing Managers page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into marketing managers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.