Skip to content
uswages .org

Marketing Managers Salary: Wyoming vs New York

Marketing Managers earn a median of $161,580 in Wyoming and $181,200 in New York. That is a nominal gap of $19,620 (-10.8%), with New York paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$161,580
Wyoming median
$174,321 after COL
$181,200
New York median
$167,901 after COL
-10.8%
Nominal gap
New York leads
+3.8%
Adjusted gap
Wyoming leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New York pays $19,620 more per year than Wyoming for marketing managers, a gap of +10.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Wyoming actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $6,421 more in national-price-level terms (a +3.8% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for marketing managers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Marketing Managers

Wyoming

Median salary
$161,580
Mean salary
$155,840
Employment
100
Location quotient
0.14
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$174,321
Regional Price Parity
92.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Marketing Managers page for Wyoming →

Marketing Managers

New York

Median salary
$181,200
Mean salary
$202,480
Employment
54,000
Location quotient
2.19
Jobs per 1,000
5.6
COL-adjusted median
$167,901
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Marketing Managers page for New York →

Related pages

Keep digging into marketing managers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.