Skip to content
uswages .org

Medical Transcriptionists Salary: South Dakota vs Wisconsin

Medical Transcriptionists earn a median of $46,070 in South Dakota and $49,150 in Wisconsin. That is a nominal gap of $3,080 (-6.3%), with Wisconsin paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$46,070
South Dakota median
$52,006 after COL
$49,150
Wisconsin median
$52,234 after COL
-6.3%
Nominal gap
Wisconsin leads
-0.4%
Adjusted gap
Wisconsin leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Wisconsin pays $3,080 more per year than South Dakota for medical transcriptionists, a gap of +6.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Wisconsin still comes out ahead, with roughly $228 of extra purchasing power (+0.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for medical transcriptionists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Medical Transcriptionists

South Dakota

Median salary
$46,070
Mean salary
$46,740
Employment
240
Location quotient
2.00
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$52,006
Regional Price Parity
88.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Medical Transcriptionists page for South Dakota →

Medical Transcriptionists

Wisconsin

Median salary
$49,150
Mean salary
$48,750
Employment
590
Location quotient
0.75
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$52,234
Regional Price Parity
94.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Medical Transcriptionists page for Wisconsin →

Related pages

Keep digging into medical transcriptionists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.