Skip to content
uswages .org

Physical Therapists Salary: Nevada vs New Jersey

Physical Therapists earn a median of $111,250 in Nevada and $112,140 in New Jersey. That is a nominal gap of $890 (-0.8%), with New Jersey paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$111,250
Nevada median
$111,273 after COL
$112,140
New Jersey median
$103,065 after COL
-0.8%
Nominal gap
New Jersey leads
+8.0%
Adjusted gap
Nevada leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Jersey pays $890 more per year than Nevada for physical therapists, a gap of +0.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Nevada actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $8,208 more in national-price-level terms (a +8.0% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for physical therapists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Physical Therapists

Nevada

Median salary
$111,250
Mean salary
$120,700
Employment
2,030
Location quotient
0.76
Jobs per 1,000
1.3
COL-adjusted median
$111,273
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Physical Therapists page for Nevada →

Physical Therapists

New Jersey

Median salary
$112,140
Mean salary
$114,550
Employment
9,750
Location quotient
1.32
Jobs per 1,000
2.3
COL-adjusted median
$103,065
Regional Price Parity
108.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Physical Therapists page for New Jersey →

Related pages

Keep digging into physical therapists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.