Skip to content
uswages .org

Physicians, Pathologists Salary: Minnesota vs Pennsylvania

Physicians, Pathologists earn a median of $362,270 in Minnesota and $413,370 in Pennsylvania. That is a nominal gap of $51,100 (-12.4%), with Pennsylvania paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$362,270
Minnesota median
$367,336 after COL
$413,370
Pennsylvania median
$423,656 after COL
-12.4%
Nominal gap
Pennsylvania leads
-13.3%
Adjusted gap
Pennsylvania leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Pennsylvania pays $51,100 more per year than Minnesota for physicians, pathologists, a gap of +12.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Pennsylvania still comes out ahead, with roughly $56,321 of extra purchasing power (+13.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for physicians, pathologists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Physicians, Pathologists

Minnesota

Median salary
$362,270
Mean salary
$368,860
Employment
550
Location quotient
2.62
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$367,336
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Physicians, Pathologists page for Minnesota →

Physicians, Pathologists

Pennsylvania

Median salary
$413,370
Mean salary
$369,170
Employment
210
Location quotient
0.49
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$423,656
Regional Price Parity
97.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Physicians, Pathologists page for Pennsylvania →

Related pages

Keep digging into physicians, pathologists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.