Skip to content
uswages .org

Procurement Clerks Salary: Colorado vs California

Procurement Clerks earn a median of $55,210 in Colorado and $56,160 in California. That is a nominal gap of $950 (-1.7%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$55,210
Colorado median
$53,575 after COL
$56,160
California median
$50,723 after COL
-1.7%
Nominal gap
California leads
+5.6%
Adjusted gap
Colorado leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $950 more per year than Colorado for procurement clerks, a gap of +1.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Colorado actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $2,852 more in national-price-level terms (a +5.6% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for procurement clerks in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Procurement Clerks

Colorado

Median salary
$55,210
Mean salary
$55,380
Employment
830
Location quotient
0.80
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$53,575
Regional Price Parity
103.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Procurement Clerks page for Colorado →

Procurement Clerks

California

Median salary
$56,160
Mean salary
$57,060
Employment
7,080
Location quotient
1.08
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$50,723
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Procurement Clerks page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into procurement clerks from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.