Skip to content
uswages .org

Telephone Operators Salary: New York vs California

Telephone Operators earn a median of $50,220 in New York and $57,170 in California. That is a nominal gap of $6,950 (-12.2%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$50,220
New York median
$46,534 after COL
$57,170
California median
$51,635 after COL
-12.2%
Nominal gap
California leads
-9.9%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $6,950 more per year than New York for telephone operators, a gap of +12.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $5,101 of extra purchasing power (+9.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for telephone operators in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Telephone Operators

New York

Median salary
$50,220
Mean salary
$52,290
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$46,534
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Telephone Operators page for New York →

Telephone Operators

California

Median salary
$57,170
Mean salary
$55,910
Employment
230
Location quotient
0.58
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$51,635
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Telephone Operators page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into telephone operators from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.