Skip to content
uswages .org

Waiters And Waitresses Salary: South Carolina vs Oregon

Waiters And Waitresses earn a median of $18,370 in South Carolina and $48,410 in Oregon. That is a nominal gap of $30,040 (-62.1%), with Oregon paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$18,370
South Carolina median
$19,595 after COL
$48,410
Oregon median
$46,836 after COL
-62.1%
Nominal gap
Oregon leads
-58.2%
Adjusted gap
Oregon leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Oregon pays $30,040 more per year than South Carolina for waiters and waitresses, a gap of +62.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Oregon still comes out ahead, with roughly $27,241 of extra purchasing power (+58.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for waiters and waitresses in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Waiters And Waitresses

South Carolina

Median salary
$18,370
Mean salary
$25,900
Employment
47,200
Location quotient
1.40
Jobs per 1,000
20.5
COL-adjusted median
$19,595
Regional Price Parity
93.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Waiters And Waitresses page for South Carolina →

Waiters And Waitresses

Oregon

Median salary
$48,410
Mean salary
$52,400
Employment
23,040
Location quotient
0.80
Jobs per 1,000
11.7
COL-adjusted median
$46,836
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Waiters And Waitresses page for Oregon →

Related pages

Keep digging into waiters and waitresses from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.