Skip to content
uswages .org

Waiters And Waitresses Salary: South Dakota vs Washington

Waiters And Waitresses earn a median of $28,990 in South Dakota and $56,130 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $27,140 (-48.4%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$28,990
South Dakota median
$32,725 after COL
$56,130
Washington median
$52,452 after COL
-48.4%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-37.6%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $27,140 more per year than South Dakota for waiters and waitresses, a gap of +48.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $19,726 of extra purchasing power (+37.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for waiters and waitresses in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Waiters And Waitresses

South Dakota

Median salary
$28,990
Mean salary
$30,860
Employment
7,350
Location quotient
1.10
Jobs per 1,000
16.1
COL-adjusted median
$32,725
Regional Price Parity
88.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Waiters And Waitresses page for South Dakota →

Waiters And Waitresses

Washington

Median salary
$56,130
Mean salary
$60,590
Employment
45,400
Location quotient
0.88
Jobs per 1,000
12.8
COL-adjusted median
$52,452
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Waiters And Waitresses page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into waiters and waitresses from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.